FACULTY OF APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE
SESSION: MAY 2013
COURSE CODE: MPW2153
E-TUTOR: MHANOGARAN A/L ARUJUNAN
TERM: ELIZABETH AUDRINE WONG LIN INN
MATRICULATION SIMPLY NO: 810108135682001
IDENTITY CARD NO .: 810108135682
PHONE NO .: 0168086059
E-MAIL: [email protected] EDU. MY
LEARNING MIDDLE: PPW SARAWAK
No| Table of content| Page
1 ) 0| Introduction| 3
2 . 0| Four types of Moral Thoughts| a few
| installment payments on your 1 Naturalism| 3
| 2 . 1 ) 1 Attributes of Naturalism| 4
| 2 . 1 ) 2 Consequences of Naturalism| 4
| 2 . a couple of Emotivism| six
| 2 . 2 . one particular Characteristics of Emotivism| several
| 2 . 2 . 2 Consequences of Emotivism| several
| installment payments on your 3 Intuitional| 7
| 2 . several. 1 Characteristics of Intuitional thoughts| 8
| installment payments on your 3. a couple of Consequences of Intuitional thoughts| 8| | 2 . 5 Rationalist| on the lookout for
| installment payments on your 4. one particular Characteristics of Rationalists| 9
| 2 . 4. two Consequences of Rational thoughts| 10
some. 0| Conclusion| 11
five. 0| References| 12
1 ) 0 Introduction
Moral believed is a main motivation lurking behind how a person views the world around him and the actions he conducts. The emphasis placed on person thought processes, beliefs and actions makes social cognitive theory a great predictor of individual and group habit. It is also useful in identifying methods behavior could be modified or perhaps changed. The topic in this matter encompasses moral thoughts like naturalism, emotivism, intuitional and rationalism. The characteristics and the effects of each type of ethical thought will be discussed in this topic. The combined influence of environment, people and behavior varieties a self-regulatory system in the individual that determines how he acts in certain situations. From this report, we all will discuss matters which could influence the traits of your person and just how moral persistence can be obtained.
installment payments on your 0 Four Types of ethical Thoughts
Honnete are beliefs and values that adapt normal standards of precisely what is right and wrong and deal with people's habits of conduct. Jones Lickona (1980), a psychoanalysis stated that consideration must be given to the introduction of moral thought; feelings and moral perform where the activities and reactions may be change between individuals due to distinct trends in moral believed on a lot of factors: a) Parental/ mom or dad guidance, b) influence simply by peers, c) experiences and d) education level. (OUM Module) The field of Moral advancement studies four types from the trends of ethical Thoughts: Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitional and Rationalists. Over the years, the relative characteristics and consequences of these competitive views have been vigorously reviewed and contested.
2 . 1 Naturalism
The ethical naturalism is the thought that there is something intolerable regarding grounding values in the requires of a keen law giver. In conduct, naturalists view humans in an exceedingly objective method; they are incredibly concerned with the underlying causes behind one's behavior and believe that one's environment and heredity condition a person's persona (that is a major difference between naturalism and realism). 2 . 1 ) 1 Attributes of Naturalism
Naturalism can be an outgrowth of realism. Like realistic look, it wants to present a nearly photographically correct version of " real" life. It can full of detailed unique content about an everyday world everyone else may well acknowledge. Naturalists' central belief, actually is that individual human beings are in the whim of uncontrollable larger makes that originate both inside and outside these people. These forces might incorporate some of the more " animal" pushes, such as the need for food, sexual intercourse, shelter, cultural dominance, etc . Or, towards a more " external" vein, these kinds of forces may include the surrounding, the man-made environment, or finance, sector, and the economy. Something, nevertheless, is always conquering down and controlling the lives of...
Sources: Blackburn, Simon (1988). " How To end up being an Honest Anti-realist, вЂќ Midwest Research in Beliefs 12, pp. 361-375.
Blackburn, Simon (1998). Ruling Interests, Oxford School Press.
Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and Consciousness, MIT Press.
Descartes, RenГ© (1641). Meditation on Initially Philosophy.
Dewey, John (1920). Reconstruction in Philosophy, N. Y.: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, John (1925). Experience and Nature, Chi town: Open Court docket.
Flanagan, Um. (1991). Varieties of Moral Character. Cambridge, MOTHER: Harvard University Press.
Joyce, 3rd there’s r
Wong, G. B. (2006). Natural Moralities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Foot, Philippa (2003)
Gibbard, Alan (1990). Wise Choices, Likely Feelings: A Theory of Normative View, Oxford University Press.
Goldman, Alvin (1979) " What is Justified Opinion? вЂќ in George S. Pappas Reason and Understanding Dordrecht, pp. 1-23.
Goldman, Alvin (1986). Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press
Goodman, Nelson (1978)
Goodman, Nelson (1979). Fact, Fictional works, and Outlook, Harvard University or college Press.
Hume, David (1748). An Query, question, inquiry, interrogation Concerning Man Understanding.
Hume, David (1751). An Query, question, inquiry, interrogation Concerning the Principles of Morals.
Huxley, Jones Henry (1893). Evolution and Ethics, Preliminary Press.
Knutson, Frank (1982). " Epiphenomenal QualiaвЂќ The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. thirty-two, No . 127 April, pp. 127-136.
Adam, William (1907/1979). Pragmatism: A brand new Name for a few Old Techniques for Thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979 (originally published in 1907).
Margen, Immanuel (1781/87). Critique of Pure Purpose, Werner Pluhar (trans. ), Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996. (First edition at first published in 1781, second edition in 1787. )
Kant, Immanuel (1783)
Kornblith, Hilary, ed. (1985). Naturalizing Epistemology, UBER Press.
McDowell, John (1995). " Two Sorts of NaturalismвЂќ in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Feet and Meaning Theory, Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence, and Warren Quinn (eds. ), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 149-79.
McDowell, John (1996). Mind and World, Harvard University Press.
Mill, Ruben Stuart (1861/1998). Utilitarianism, Roger Crips (ed. ), Oxford University Press. (Originally printed in 1861).
Moore, G. E. (1925). " A Defense of Common Sense, вЂќ Contemporary Uk Philosophy (2nd series), education. J. H. Muirhead. Reprinted in Moore (1959c).
Moore, G. Electronic. (1959a). " Proof of the External WorldвЂќ Ch. 7 of Moore (1959b), pp. 126-148.
Moore, G. At the. (1959b). Philosophical Papers. Greater london: George, Allen and Unwin.
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1898/1992). Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Meeting Lectures of 1898, Kenneth Laine Ketner (ed., guide. ) and Hilary Putnam (intro., comm. ), Harvard University Press, 1992.
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1903/1997). Pragmatism as a Rule and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Classes on Pragmatism, Patricia Ann Turrisi (ed. ), SUNY Press.
Putnam, Hilary (1981). Reason, Fact and Background, Cambridge University or college Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969a). " Epistemology Naturalized, вЂќ Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.
Quine, T. V. To. (1969b). " Natural Types, вЂќOntological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press.
Quine, T. V. Um. (1990). Quest for Truth, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Reid, Jones (1785). Documents on the Intellectual Powers of Man.
Rorty, Richard (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism, University of Minnesota Press.
Ruse, Michael jordan (1986). Choosing Darwin Really: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy, N. Y.: Blackwell.
Trick, Michael & Wilson, Electronic. O. (1985). " The Evolution of Ethics, вЂќ New Scientist 108, pp. 50-52.
Searle, John (1980). " Thoughts, Brains and Programs, вЂќ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417-57.
Searle, John (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Trigg, Roger (1982). The Shaping of Man: Philosophical Aspects of Sociobiology, Oxford: Blackwell.
Urmson, J. O. (1968). The emotive theory of ethics. Greater london: Hutchinson & Co.
Ritcher, D. They would. (1989). The critical traditions: Classical text messaging and modern-day trends. Ny: St . Martin's Press.
Gensler, H. L. (1998). Integrity: a contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge.
Retrieved from http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/alevelphilosophy/data/A2/Moral/Emotivism.pdf on, may 19, 2013.
Waluchow, Wilfrid. (2003). The dimensions of ethics. Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd
Recovered from http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/alevelphilosophy/data/A2/Moral/Emotivism.pdf on May nineteen, 2013.
Recovered from http://ethicsinpr.wikispaces.com/Emotivism on May twenty-three, 2013
Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/aquinas_rs/strengths-weaknesses-of-emotivism on May 23, 2013
Recovered from http://www.slideshare.net/aquinas_rs/strengths-weaknesses-of-emotivism on May 3, 2013